Concerns and challenges involving my proposed Action Research Project

My biggest concern as far as implementing my action plan lies in the position I currently have this coming year. The last three years I taught in Resource and if I needed to meet with a teacher, I had a small degree of flexibility to do so during the day. However, this coming year I am moving into a general ed. teaching spot so will have a set schedule every day. This will have some benefits, but it will also add a challenge in being able to meet with administrators and other teachers. Meetings will have to be during my conference period or after school, and asking someone to stay after school can be a challenge in itself. Additionally, since I will be teaching a TAKS grade level and a tested content, I will be asked to hold after school tutorials. So my after school schedule will have time constraints once the tutorials begin.

Another challenge that I believe I will face will be during the feedback gathering stage in which feedback from teachers, students and parents on reading interventions is solicited. Effective communication and ensuring good, reliable information is given will be a must.

My best opportunity for addressing these challenges will be in working closely with my Site Supervisor. She is also the Assistant Principal and I will be able to seek her assistance on many of the issues I mentioned above.

Action Research Project Planning Template

Below is my first draft of the Action Research Plan using a Planning Template. This assignment is for my Lamar class titled "Action Research and Inquiry." I welcome comments and suggestions on the subject.

Tool 7.1 Action Planning Template

Goal:	In what ways do interventions impact struggling readers in the Resource program? How can direct instruction be used even more to help students struggling to achieve/maintain grade level performance? What effects would implementing a full inclusion/collaborative teaching setting have on struggling students, as well as those who are on grade level?
Action Step(s)	Person(s) Responsible	Timeline: Start/End	Needed Resources	Evaluation
1. Analyze baseline reading levels and assessment scores for students in Resource	Principal, testing coordinator, LA Resource teacher	Mid-September 2010 / October 2010	Data from AIMSweb benchmark after school startup; AWARE scores from baseline reading benchmark, AWARE scores from previous year	Scores obtained, reading levels and scores are determined for current year, data compared to previous year as appropriate
2. Interview reading teachers on each grade level to discuss specific students and interventions being used in class	Principal, A/P, LA Resource Teacher	October 2010 / November 2010	Access to teachers during conference period or other designated time	Notes and comments from interviews.
3. Consult with teachers participating in collaborative teaching strategies this year	Principal, A/P, Reading/LA Gen. Ed. Teachers, LA Resource teacher	Late August 2010 / September 2010	Time for discussion with teachers either individually or in a group	Field notes obtained from discussion
4. Research and gather information on best practices and intervention methods	Principal, Diagnostician, Coordinator for Sp. Ed./Admin.	October 2010 / December 2010	Internet sites, journal articles, personal interviews, consultation with “sister” campuses within district	Bank of information obtained from research and collaboration and brainstorming on ways to implement appropriate portions for our campus
5.Research and gather information on the successful implementation of collaborative teaching strategies	Principal, LA Resource teacher, Coordinator for Sp. Ed.	August 2010 / October 2010	Interviews with campuses in our district currently using such strategies, journal articles, documentation on proper strategies for collaborative teaching, interviews with administration staff	Information obtained to begin comparing and analyzing NSE’s efforts for co-teaching implementation and determine focus for continued improvement
6. Gather mid-year data for comparison to baseline data	Principal, Testing coordinator, LA Resource teacher	December 2010 / January 2011	Mid-year benchmark data and AIMSweb Winter benchmark data	Data compared to initial benchmarks and determination of progress or lack of made
7. Interview teachers participating in collaborative teaching classrooms for mid-year feedback	Principal, A/P, LA Resource teacher, participating teachers	November 2010 / December 2010 to early January 2011	Time and availability of teachers for interviewing	Field notes on teacher feedback on progress, success, concerns of collaborative teaching
8. Interview select students (Resource and those on grade level) for their perspective on interventions and/or collaborative teaching setting, and their individual progress	Principal, LA Resource teacher, A/P, Gen. Ed. Teachers, target students	November 2010 / January 2011	Recommendation for which students to interview, access to students for interviews, is permission from parents needed?	Field notes recording student feedback on interventions and/or collaborative teaching
9. Interview parents of resource students receiving interventions and/or gen ed. assigned to collaborative teaching classroom	Principal, A/P, Gen. Ed. and Resource teachers, parents of target students	November 2010 / February 2011	Parents willing to be interviewed either individually or in a panel to discuss what is working and what is not, and brainstorm future efforts	Field notes from interviews on parents feedback on interventions and co-teach classroom
10. Gather post-TAKS assessment data and compare to last year (if appropriate) and to baseline benchmarks this year, as well as AIMSweb Spring benchmarks	Principal, A/P, testing coordinator, LA Resource teacher	April 2011 / May 2011 (June if 2nd assessment is needed for 5th gr.)	Scores from TAKS, and end of year benchmark assessment, AIMSweb Spring benchmark scores,	TAKS Scores obtained for target students, as well as benchmark and AIMSweb results for comparison to prior testing data
11. Reflect on results of data comparison and feedback from stakeholders, and determine what the next step in the process will be, including who should be involved in the initial planning stages moving forward	Principal, A/P, Testing coordinator, diagnostician, LA Resource teacher, Gen. Ed. Reading and LA teachers, Reading specialist, Coordinator for Spec. Ed. / Admin.	End of May 2011	Findings from this action plan	Results of committee brainstorming efforts to target the next phase of action for ensuring campus and student improvement.